Difference between revisions of "GraviCase Log"

From ESE205 Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 12: Line 12:
 
Due to concerns about both the feasibility and safety of our project, we have begun researching into some of the individual parts of our project. We want to make sure that we can come up with a cheap effective way to make and test our project. We see the airbag portion of our idea as the elephant in the room as far as cost is concerned. Additionally, we have begun research into a way to inflate our airbag safely and quickly enough to meet the safety and usefulness goals we have set for our project. While originally we were leaning towards a chemically inflated airbag, through consultation with out TA, we believe a compressed air inflation will be 1 safer, 2 cheaper, and 3 most realistic. We have begun looking into personal airbags which inflate from compressed air and starting to run some of the cost numbers as well as the ability for us to reverse engineer the deployment system for a smaller airbag. We need to begin designing our product, specific concerns we have are the powering mechanism, the airbag shape, the airbag inflating mechanism, preventing premature / unnecessary inflation of the airbag and also the speed at which we can fill the airbag (as it must be able to inflate in the time it takes for the phone to hit the ground.  
 
Due to concerns about both the feasibility and safety of our project, we have begun researching into some of the individual parts of our project. We want to make sure that we can come up with a cheap effective way to make and test our project. We see the airbag portion of our idea as the elephant in the room as far as cost is concerned. Additionally, we have begun research into a way to inflate our airbag safely and quickly enough to meet the safety and usefulness goals we have set for our project. While originally we were leaning towards a chemically inflated airbag, through consultation with out TA, we believe a compressed air inflation will be 1 safer, 2 cheaper, and 3 most realistic. We have begun looking into personal airbags which inflate from compressed air and starting to run some of the cost numbers as well as the ability for us to reverse engineer the deployment system for a smaller airbag. We need to begin designing our product, specific concerns we have are the powering mechanism, the airbag shape, the airbag inflating mechanism, preventing premature / unnecessary inflation of the airbag and also the speed at which we can fill the airbag (as it must be able to inflate in the time it takes for the phone to hit the ground.  
 
We have a few ideas related to this: we have a rudimentary idea of how we want the airbag shaped. However, more research and discussion is necessary for the powering and inflating parts of our project. I have an idea related to a CSE132 lab I did involving peak detection to count "steps" on the arduino platform, and we believe that this may be the most effective way for us  to ensure it doesn't inflate prematurely.  
 
We have a few ideas related to this: we have a rudimentary idea of how we want the airbag shaped. However, more research and discussion is necessary for the powering and inflating parts of our project. I have an idea related to a CSE132 lab I did involving peak detection to count "steps" on the arduino platform, and we believe that this may be the most effective way for us  to ensure it doesn't inflate prematurely.  
 +
 +
==Week 3 (September 17-24):==
 +
We met with our TA, Andrew, on Tuesday and Professor Feher on Friday to discuss our project and we have moved towards the idea of our project being more of a prototype then a finished project. We also opened ourselves up to the idea of it being a case for any electronics which would help with our size constraints.
 +
*One issue we still have is with safety
 +
**Through our meetings we have discussed our accelerometer peak detection idea which we see as viable and if we transition to a non phone case this will allow us to not worry so much about everyday movement.
 +
**Additionally we have decided on compressed air as our main method of airbag filling, and while we were worried about our method of puncturing it, Andrew told us he believes there is a valve attachment for Arduino which we could use. We have begun researching this and currently it is out primary way of filling our airbag.
 +
***We believe compressed air will be much safer than the chemical explosion used to fill a car airbag, it also makes it easy to replace and test the airbag with refillable CO2 cartridges.
 +
*Our other main obstacle is cost which is primarily due to the airbag:
 +
**Andrew recommended trying to make our own, or at least experiment with makeshift materials so we could get an idea as to the shape and size of the airbag.
 +
***We were unable to get out this weekend to get testing materials, but we plan on doing so later this week. However, the main focus of our past week has been on improving the website and also working out the cost related issues of our project.
 +
**Professor Feher recommended finding someone with origami skills so that we could work on an efficiently folded and easily deployable airbag. He also agreeded with Andrews suggestion above and suggested that once we got the shape and size of our airbag down that we try to find people with structural engineering / material science backgrounds to help us find a workable and durable material.
  
  
 
[[Category:Logs]]
 
[[Category:Logs]]
 
[[Category:Fall 2017 Logs]]
 
[[Category:Fall 2017 Logs]]

Revision as of 18:40, 18 September 2017

Weekly Log for GraviCase Project

By Matt Rocco and Michael Morgan

Week 1 (September 1-8, 2017):

"Decided" on project, started to gameplan objectives and obstacles of project, began to think of how to accomplish goals and design / build our project. Ironing out details on what skillsets we will have to pick up / refresh to accomplish our design. Created wiki and weekly log.


Week 2 (September 9-16, 2017):

Due to concerns about both the feasibility and safety of our project, we have begun researching into some of the individual parts of our project. We want to make sure that we can come up with a cheap effective way to make and test our project. We see the airbag portion of our idea as the elephant in the room as far as cost is concerned. Additionally, we have begun research into a way to inflate our airbag safely and quickly enough to meet the safety and usefulness goals we have set for our project. While originally we were leaning towards a chemically inflated airbag, through consultation with out TA, we believe a compressed air inflation will be 1 safer, 2 cheaper, and 3 most realistic. We have begun looking into personal airbags which inflate from compressed air and starting to run some of the cost numbers as well as the ability for us to reverse engineer the deployment system for a smaller airbag. We need to begin designing our product, specific concerns we have are the powering mechanism, the airbag shape, the airbag inflating mechanism, preventing premature / unnecessary inflation of the airbag and also the speed at which we can fill the airbag (as it must be able to inflate in the time it takes for the phone to hit the ground. We have a few ideas related to this: we have a rudimentary idea of how we want the airbag shaped. However, more research and discussion is necessary for the powering and inflating parts of our project. I have an idea related to a CSE132 lab I did involving peak detection to count "steps" on the arduino platform, and we believe that this may be the most effective way for us to ensure it doesn't inflate prematurely.

Week 3 (September 17-24):

We met with our TA, Andrew, on Tuesday and Professor Feher on Friday to discuss our project and we have moved towards the idea of our project being more of a prototype then a finished project. We also opened ourselves up to the idea of it being a case for any electronics which would help with our size constraints.

  • One issue we still have is with safety
    • Through our meetings we have discussed our accelerometer peak detection idea which we see as viable and if we transition to a non phone case this will allow us to not worry so much about everyday movement.
    • Additionally we have decided on compressed air as our main method of airbag filling, and while we were worried about our method of puncturing it, Andrew told us he believes there is a valve attachment for Arduino which we could use. We have begun researching this and currently it is out primary way of filling our airbag.
      • We believe compressed air will be much safer than the chemical explosion used to fill a car airbag, it also makes it easy to replace and test the airbag with refillable CO2 cartridges.
  • Our other main obstacle is cost which is primarily due to the airbag:
    • Andrew recommended trying to make our own, or at least experiment with makeshift materials so we could get an idea as to the shape and size of the airbag.
      • We were unable to get out this weekend to get testing materials, but we plan on doing so later this week. However, the main focus of our past week has been on improving the website and also working out the cost related issues of our project.
    • Professor Feher recommended finding someone with origami skills so that we could work on an efficiently folded and easily deployable airbag. He also agreeded with Andrews suggestion above and suggested that once we got the shape and size of our airbag down that we try to find people with structural engineering / material science backgrounds to help us find a workable and durable material.