Difference between revisions of "MatrixMultiply"

From CSE231 Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "=Background= Matrix multiplication is a simple mathematical operation which we will replicate in this studio. For our purposes, we will only deal with square matrices (same n...")
 
m (Added note about auto-coarsening)
 
(123 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
=Motivation=
 +
We gain experience using the parallel for loop constructs.
 +
 
=Background=
 
=Background=
  
Matrix multiplication is a simple mathematical operation which we will replicate in this studio. For our purposes, we will only deal with square matrices (same number of rows and columns). However, we will approach this problem with several different parallel constructs and approaches. For those unfamiliar on how to multiply two matrices, take a look at [https://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/matrix-multiplying.html this link] for a quick overview.
+
Matrix multiplication is a simple mathematical operation which we will replicate in this studio. For our purposes, we will only deal with square matrices (same number of rows and columns). However, we will approach this problem with several different parallel constructs and approaches.
 +
 
 +
For those unfamiliar on how to multiply two matrices, take a look at these overviews:
 +
* [https://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/matrix-multiplying.html Math Is Fun]
 +
* [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MatrixMultiplication.html Wolfram MathWorld]
 +
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_multiplication Wikipedia]
 +
 
 +
If <math>\mathbf{A}</math> is an <math>n \times m</math> matrix and <math>\mathbf{B}</math> is an <math>m  \times p</math> matrix
 +
 
 +
for each i=[0..n) and for each j=[0..p)
 +
 
 +
: <math>(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{B})_{ij} = \sum_{k=1}^m A_{ik}B_{kj}</math>
 +
 
 +
:<math>\mathbf{C}=\begin{pmatrix}
 +
a_{11}b_{11} +\cdots + a_{1n}b_{n1} & a_{11}b_{12} +\cdots + a_{1n}b_{n2} & \cdots & a_{11}b_{1p} +\cdots + a_{1n}b_{np} \\
 +
a_{21}b_{11} +\cdots + a_{2n}b_{n1} & a_{21}b_{12} +\cdots + a_{2n}b_{n2} & \cdots & a_{21}b_{1p} +\cdots + a_{2n}b_{np} \\
 +
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\
 +
a_{m1}b_{11} +\cdots + a_{mn}b_{n1} & a_{m1}b_{12} +\cdots + a_{mn}b_{n2} & \cdots & a_{m1}b_{1p} +\cdots + a_{mn}b_{np} \\
 +
\end{pmatrix}
 +
</math>
 +
 
 +
source: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_multiplication#General_definition_of_the_matrix_product Matrix Multiplication on Wikipedia]
 +
 
 +
=Code To Investigate=
 +
==Demo Video==
 +
<youtube>iEuYiy1Bx2A</youtube>
 +
==SequentialMatrixMultiplier==
 +
{{CodeToInvestigate|SequentialMatrixMultiplier|multiply|matrixmultiply.demo|demo}}
 +
 
 +
==SequentialMatrixMultiplierClient==
 +
{{CodeToInvestigate|SequentialMatrixMultiplierClient|main|matrixmultiply.client|demo}}
 +
 
 +
==MatrixMultiplyApp==
 +
{{Viz|MatrixMultiplyApp|matrixmultiply.viz|demo}}
 +
 
 +
[[File:Martix multiply app 3x5 X 5x4.png|800px]]
 +
 
 +
=The Core Questions=
 +
*What are the tasks?
 +
*What is the data?
 +
*Is the data mutable?
 +
*If so, how is it shared?
 +
 
 +
=Code To Implement=
 +
 
 +
There are three methods you will need to implement, all of which are different ways to use parallel for loops to solve the problem. To assist you, the [https://classes.engineering.wustl.edu/cse231/core/index.php?title=MatrixMultiply#SequentialMatrixMultiplier sequential implementation] has been implemented in a [[#Demo_Video|demo video]].
 +
 
 +
==LoopLoopMatrixMultiplier==
 +
{{CodeToImplement|LoopLoopMatrixMultiplier|multiply|matrixmultiply.exercise}}
  
=Where to Start=
+
{{Parallel|public double[][] multiply(double[][] a, double[][] b)}}
  
You can find all of the relevant files for the assignment under the '''matrix-multiply''' directory. From there, you will need to implement the <code>Matrix</code> and <code>SubMatrix</code> classes.
+
In this implementation, you will simply convert the sequential solution into a parallel one using two nested [https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~dennis.cosgrove/courses/cse231/spring22/apidocs/fj/FJ.html#join_void_fork_loop(int,int,fj.api.TaskIntConsumer) parallel fork loops].
  
==Matrix==
+
=== Computation Graph ===
  
There are seven methods you will need to implement, all of which are different ways to use parallel for loops to solve the problem. To assist you, the sequential implementation has already been completed for you. We recommend starting from the top and working your way down.
+
For 3x3 Matrix X 3x3 Matrix:
  
===parallelForAllIMultiply===
+
[[File:LoopLoopMatrixMultiplier_Computation_Graph.svg|800px]]
  
In this implementation, you will simply convert the sequential solution into a parallel one using a forall loop. This should be the easiest parallel implementation and should only require minor changes to work properly.
+
==Loop2dMatrixMultiplier==
 +
{{CodeToImplement|Loop2dMatrixMultiplier|multiply|matrixmultiply.exercise}}
  
===parallelChunkedForAllIMultiply===
+
{{Parallel|public double[][] multiply(double[][] a, double[][] b)}}
  
In this implementation, we will add a minor performance boost to the process by using the forall-chunked construct. Although similar to the traditional forall loop, it increases speedup using iteration grouping/chunking. This topic is discussed in detail in this [https://edge.edx.org/courses/RiceX/COMP322/1T2014R/courseware/a900dd0655384de3b5ef01e508ea09d7/6349730bb2a149a0b33fa23db7afddee/?activate_block_id=i4x%3A%2F%2FRiceX%2FCOMP322%2Fsequential%2F6349730bb2a149a0b33fa23db7afddee Rice video] and explained in the [http://pasiphae.cs.rice.edu/#hjlib-for-parallelchunkediterationwithimplicitfinish HJ documentation]. There is no need to specify anything, allow the runtime to determine the chunking.
+
<!--
 +
In this implementation, we will cut down the syntax of the two forall implementation with the use of V5’s <code>forall2d</code> method. Functionally, this method serves the purpose of using two forall loops. [[Reference_Page#Forall_2d|Take a look at the reference page]] if you have questions on how to utilize this loop.
 +
-->
  
===parallelGroupedForAllTasksForSeqIMultiply===
+
[https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~dennis.cosgrove/courses/cse231/spring22/apidocs/fj/FJ.html#join_void_fork_loop_2d(int,int,int,int,fj.api.TaskBiIntConsumer) join_void_fork_loop_2d]
  
In this implementation, we will make use of HJ’s iteration regions in order to manually group them for the sake of performance. You only need to use a 1D region for this method, but you will need to make notable changes from your previous work. For optimal performance, we will break down the parallel tasks so that they equal the exact number of working threads. You can access this information using HJ’s <code>numWorkerThreads()</code> method. After launching a number of tasks equal to the number of worker threads, use HJ’s <code>myGroup()</code> method to create a new 1D region from the index of the thread, a 1D region specified to the size of the matrix, and the number of threads. After that, launch the code as you did previously and multiply the two matrices.
+
=== Computation Graph ===
  
Hint: use forseq to create a sequential for loop that can access the indices of a HJ iteration region.
+
For 3x3 Matrix X 3x3 Matrix:
  
===parallelForAllIForAllJMultiply===
+
[[File:Loop2dMatrixMultiplier_Computation_Graph.svg|800px]]
  
In this implementation, we will increase the parallelism of the previous implementations using two forall loops instead of one. There is no need to chunk or group the iterations. This should look very similar to the original forall implementation.
+
==Loop2dAutoCoarsenMatrixMultiplier==
 +
{{CodeToImplement|Loop2dAutoCoarsenMatrixMultiplier|multiply|matrixmultiply.exercise}}
  
===parallelForAll2dIJMultiply===
+
{{Parallel|public double[][] multiply(double[][] a, double[][] b)}}
  
In this implementation, we will cut down the syntax of the two forall implementation with the use of HJ’s <code>forall2d</code> method. Functionally, this method serves the purpose of using two forall loops. The input parameters should equal the input parameters of the two separate forall loops. For example,
+
[https://www.cse.wustl.edu/~dennis.cosgrove/courses/cse231/spring22/apidocs/fj/FJ.html#join_void_fork_loop_2d_auto_coarsen(int,int,int,int,fj.api.TaskBiIntConsumer) join_void_fork_loop_2d_auto_coarsen]
<nowiki>forall(min, max, (i) -> {
 
forall(min, max, (j) -> doSomething());
 
});</nowiki>
 
Would appear as <code>forall2d(min, max, min, max, (i, j) -> doSomething());</code> in the forall2d syntax.
 
  
===parallelChunkedForAll2dIJMultiply===
+
This implementation will look very similar to the previous one, so don't overthink it! The real benefit can be seen in the performance difference between the two based on the coarsening being done behind the scenes.
 +
<!--
 +
In this implementation, we will add a minor performance boost to the process by using the forall-chunked construct. Although similar to the traditional forall loop, it increases performance using iteration grouping/chunking. This topic is discussed in detail in this [https://edge.edx.org/courses/RiceX/COMP322/1T2014R/courseware/a900dd0655384de3b5ef01e508ea09d7/6349730bb2a149a0b33fa23db7afddee/?activate_block_id=i4x%3A%2F%2FRiceX%2FCOMP322%2Fsequential%2F6349730bb2a149a0b33fa23db7afddee Rice video] and explained in the [[Reference_Page#Parallel_Loops|V5 documentation]]. There is no need to specify anything, allow the runtime to determine the chunking.
  
This method should build on the previous 2d method and optimize its performance using chunked(). This should look very familiar from the previous implementations. Again, there is no need to specify how to chunk, leave it all to the runtime.
+
NOTE: we contemplated also assigning building a 1D forall chunked version.  We deemed this more work that it was worth given that you are already building the 2d version.  Just know that forall(chunked(), ...) exists for 1d loops as well.
  
===parallelGroupedForAllTasksForSeq2dIJMultiply (need help explaining this)===
+
Use chunking.  It is a nice feature.
 +
-->
  
This is the most difficult implementation out of all of the previous methods. However, if you did everything beforehand, a lot of the steps are a synthesis of the forall2d implementations and the 1D grouping implementation.
+
=Extra Credit Challege Divide and Conquer=
 +
[[Matrix_Multiply_Divide_and_Conquer_Assignment|Divide and Conquer Matrix Multiplication]]
  
'''UNDER CONSTRUCTION'''
+
=Testing Your Solution=
 +
==Correctness==
 +
{{TestSuite|__MatrixMultiplyTestSuite|matrixmultiply.studio}}
  
==SubMatrix==
+
==Performance==
 +
{{Performance|MatrixMultiplicationTiming|matrixmultiply.performance}}
  
In this implementation, you will solve the matrix multiply problem in parallel using recursion. Although this class should be able to take in a matrix of any size, try to imagine this as a 2x2 matrix in order to make it easier to solve. Once you solve the sequential method, the parallel method should look very similar with exception of an async/finish block.
+
Investigate the performance difference for your different implementations.  When you run MatrixMultiplicationTiming it will put a CSV of the timings into your copy buffer.  You can then paste them into a spreadsheet and chart the performance. Feel free to tune the parameters of the test to see the impacts of, for example, different matrix sizes.
  
In order to obtain the desired result matrix, you will need to recursively call the correct submatrices for each of the four result submatrices. Imagining this as a 2x2 matrix, remember that the dot products of the rows of the first matrix and the columns of the second matrix create the result matrix.
+
[[File:Matrix multiply performance.png]]
  
Hint: Each result submatrix should have two recursive calls, for a total of eight recursive calls.
+
=Pledge, Acknowledgments, Citations=
 +
{{Pledge|matrix-multiply}}

Latest revision as of 00:21, 14 February 2023

Motivation

We gain experience using the parallel for loop constructs.

Background

Matrix multiplication is a simple mathematical operation which we will replicate in this studio. For our purposes, we will only deal with square matrices (same number of rows and columns). However, we will approach this problem with several different parallel constructs and approaches.

For those unfamiliar on how to multiply two matrices, take a look at these overviews:

If is an matrix and is an matrix

for each i=[0..n) and for each j=[0..p)

source: Matrix Multiplication on Wikipedia

Code To Investigate

Demo Video

SequentialMatrixMultiplier

class: SequentialMatrixMultiplier.java DEMO: Java.png
methods: multiply
package: matrixmultiply.demo
source folder: src/demo/java

SequentialMatrixMultiplierClient

class: SequentialMatrixMultiplierClient.java DEMO: Java.png
methods: main
package: matrixmultiply.client
source folder: src/demo/java

MatrixMultiplyApp

class: MatrixMultiplyApp.java VIZ
package: matrixmultiply.viz
source folder: student/src/demo/java

Martix multiply app 3x5 X 5x4.png

The Core Questions

  • What are the tasks?
  • What is the data?
  • Is the data mutable?
  • If so, how is it shared?

Code To Implement

There are three methods you will need to implement, all of which are different ways to use parallel for loops to solve the problem. To assist you, the sequential implementation has been implemented in a demo video.

LoopLoopMatrixMultiplier

class: LoopLoopMatrixMultiplier.java Java.png
methods: multiply
package: matrixmultiply.exercise
source folder: student/src/main/java

method: public double[][] multiply(double[][] a, double[][] b) Parallel.svg (parallel implementation required)

In this implementation, you will simply convert the sequential solution into a parallel one using two nested parallel fork loops.

Computation Graph

For 3x3 Matrix X 3x3 Matrix:

LoopLoopMatrixMultiplier Computation Graph.svg

Loop2dMatrixMultiplier

class: Loop2dMatrixMultiplier.java Java.png
methods: multiply
package: matrixmultiply.exercise
source folder: student/src/main/java

method: public double[][] multiply(double[][] a, double[][] b) Parallel.svg (parallel implementation required)


join_void_fork_loop_2d

Computation Graph

For 3x3 Matrix X 3x3 Matrix:

Loop2dMatrixMultiplier Computation Graph.svg

Loop2dAutoCoarsenMatrixMultiplier

class: Loop2dAutoCoarsenMatrixMultiplier.java Java.png
methods: multiply
package: matrixmultiply.exercise
source folder: student/src/main/java

method: public double[][] multiply(double[][] a, double[][] b) Parallel.svg (parallel implementation required)

join_void_fork_loop_2d_auto_coarsen

This implementation will look very similar to the previous one, so don't overthink it! The real benefit can be seen in the performance difference between the two based on the coarsening being done behind the scenes.

Extra Credit Challege Divide and Conquer

Divide and Conquer Matrix Multiplication

Testing Your Solution

Correctness

class: __MatrixMultiplyTestSuite.java Junit.png
package: matrixmultiply.studio
source folder: testing/src/test/java

Performance

class: MatrixMultiplicationTiming.java Noun Project stopwatch icon 386232 cc.svg
package: matrixmultiply.performance
source folder: src/main/java

Investigate the performance difference for your different implementations. When you run MatrixMultiplicationTiming it will put a CSV of the timings into your copy buffer. You can then paste them into a spreadsheet and chart the performance. Feel free to tune the parameters of the test to see the impacts of, for example, different matrix sizes.

Matrix multiply performance.png

Pledge, Acknowledgments, Citations

file: matrix-multiply-pledge-acknowledgments-citations.txt

More info about the Honor Pledge