3.13.1 Transferring results between dissimilar meshes in ABAQUS/Standard

Product: ABAQUS/Standard  

Elements tested

C3D8R    C3D10    C3D10M    C3D20    C3D4    C3D8T    C3D20RT   

CAX3H    CAX4    CGAX4HT    CGAX8RT   

CPE3    CPE4    CPE6    CPE6H    CPE8    CPE8R   

CPEG3HT    CPEG4HT   

CPS3    CPS4    CPS4T    DC2D4   

Feature tested

*MAP SOLUTION

Problem description

The verification tests in this section consist of pairs of models. Within each pair the first, or ancestor, model undergoes a simple deformation to a deformed configuration. The second, or descendent, model represents the deformed configuration of the ancestor with a different mesh and possibly with different element types. The solution from the ancestor model is transferred to the descendent model, and the resulting state of this model is verified to be consistent with the ancestor in its deformed configuration.

Model:

The ancestor model has a simple rectangular geometry. In most cases the model contains two distinct material regions, shown in Figure 3.13.1–1. This model undergoes a uniform compression, as shown in Figure 3.13.1–2, and the resulting configuration is chosen as the geometry for the descendent model, as shown in Figure 3.13.1–3. Models with axisymmetric elements are placed at a large radial position so that the element behavior is near to that of plane strain elements. Models with three-dimensional elements have a depth of 10 units and have meshes slightly different from those shown in the following planar mesh figures.

Figure 3.13.1–1 Ancestor model geometry.

Figure 3.13.1–2 Deformation of the ancestor model.

Figure 3.13.1–3 Descendent model geometry.

Mesh:

Nonuniform meshes are chosen, as illustrated in Figure 3.13.1–4, Figure 3.13.1–5, Figure 3.13.1–6, and Figure 3.13.1–7.

Figure 3.13.1–4 Ancestor model triangular mesh.

Figure 3.13.1–5 Ancestor model quadrilateral mesh.

Figure 3.13.1–6 Descendent model triangular mesh.

Figure 3.13.1–7 Descendent model quadrilateral mesh.

Material:

Material properties are selected from among the following models. In cases where two different material properties are used in adjacent regions, the parameters listed first are applied to one material region and the parameters listed second are applied to the other:

Elastic (including UMAT implementation)


Young's modulus1 × 104 and 1 × 105
Poisson's ratio0.3

Elastic/plastic

Young's modulus1 × 104 and 1 × 105
Poisson's ratio0.3
Yield stress8 × 103 and 8 × 104

Hyperelastic

C101.9 × 103
D112.4 × 10–4

Boundary conditions:

The ancestor model is constrained from vertical motion on the bottom surface and from horizontal motion along the interface between the material regions. The top surface is then compressed with a uniform motion while the sides expand with a prescribed, volume preserving motion. These boundary conditions result in a deformed configuration that is independent of the material models used in the analysis. In some tests the deformed configuration shown in Figure 3.13.1–2 is reached at an intermediate step and increment, which enables testing of solution mapping from intermediate configurations.

Ancestor models with temperature degrees of freedom have a temperature of zero prescribed on the lower boundary and a temperature of 1000 prescribed on the upper boundary, resulting in a linear variation in temperature across the height of the model.

Results and discussion

The material solution variables in each descendent model are verified to match those in the ancestor model in its deformed configuration. In cases where the models have distinct material regions, the solution variables in the descendent model are verified to be distinct with no smoothing across the material boundary. The linear distribution in temperature in models with temperature degrees of freedom is verified to agree between the ancestor and the descendent model.

Input files

The input file names describe the analysis procedure, element type, and material type. The input files are grouped in pairs; each pair is comprised of an ancestor model, from which the solution is transferred, and a descendent model, to which the solution is transferred.

The ancestor analysis files follow the format pmap_element_material_options_a.inp; the descendent analysis files follow the format pmap_element_material_options_d.inp.

element indicates the element type or types used in the analysis. material indicates the type of material in the analysis. options indicates the particular procedure or feature tested.

CPE8 element tests:


CPE4 element tests:


CPE4 element tests with orientations defined in the ancestor model:


CPE4 element tests with orientations defined in the descendent model:


Tests of solution mapping from CPS4 to CPS3 elements:


Tests of solution mapping from CPE3 to CPE4 elements:


Tests of solution mapping from CPEG3HT to CPEG4HT elements:


Tests of solution mapping from CAX3H to CAX4 elements:


Tests of solution mapping from CPE8R to CPE6H elements with a user material definition:


Tests of solution mapping from CGAX4HT to CGAX8RT elements:


Tests of solution mapping from CPE6 to CPE8 elements with a hyperelastic material defined:


Tests of solution mapping from CPS4T to DC2D4 elements:


Tests of solution mapping from C3D8R to C3D10 elements:


Tests of solution mapping from C3D10M to C3D20 elements:


Tests of solution mapping from C3D4 to C3D10M elements with a rotation applied to the ancestor model:


Tests of solution mapping from C3D8T to C3D20RT elements: