Difference between revisions of "Trilateration in Robotic Sensing using Acoustic Conclusions"
From ESE497 Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<sidebar>Trilateration_in_Robotic_Sensing_using_Acoustic_Sensors_Nav</sidebar> | <sidebar>Trilateration_in_Robotic_Sensing_using_Acoustic_Sensors_Nav</sidebar> | ||
| − | ===Conclusions | + | ===Conclusions=== |
| + | Our results this semester indicate that neither quantization nor noise should cause significant error. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Future Work=== | ||
| + | Topics of Interest: | ||
| + | *How does the arrangement of anchor nodes effect the resolution map? | ||
| + | *What is the cause of bias in range estimation? | ||
| + | *How well does range estimation work on moving targets? | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 21 December 2010
<sidebar>Trilateration_in_Robotic_Sensing_using_Acoustic_Sensors_Nav</sidebar>
Conclusions
Our results this semester indicate that neither quantization nor noise should cause significant error.
Future Work
Topics of Interest:
- How does the arrangement of anchor nodes effect the resolution map?
- What is the cause of bias in range estimation?
- How well does range estimation work on moving targets?
