Difference between revisions of "Chemical Sensors SP 2011"
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
- Made more corrections to brute force algorithm, and processed trials from week 5. Unfortunately, the results still indicate that the sensor array detects the isopropyl alcohol source on one side of the array, no matter where the alcohol is actually located. | - Made more corrections to brute force algorithm, and processed trials from week 5. Unfortunately, the results still indicate that the sensor array detects the isopropyl alcohol source on one side of the array, no matter where the alcohol is actually located. | ||
| − | - | + | - Realized that the resistances that were in series with the sensors were chosen specifically for the sensors in the old array. Therefore, altered resistances in series with sensors in the circuit so that voltages produced by each sensor in a pair were consistent. I.e., sensors 1 and 2 should produce similar voltages when smelling alcohol, as should sensors 3 and 4, and 5 and 6. Used this array to collect a second batch of data (2 trials per side per distance). However, this still gave bad results, i.e., results that were similar to those from week 5's data. |
| + | |||
| + | - Next, we tried putting each sensor was in series with the same resistance, regardless of the disparities in voltage. We also spaced the sensors farther apart (1 inch), to improve the discrimination between sides. With this modified circuit configuration, we took 3 trials per side per distance. Processed this data, and the brute-force algorithm STILL yielded bad results. The dynamic-time-warp algorithm looks more promising, but is still pretty bad. The results of DTW suggest that sensor pair 2 is always biased towards one side. Therefore, attempted to run the DTW algorithm on only the other 2 pairs, but still working on the coding for this. | ||
| + | |||
Week 7: | Week 7: | ||
Revision as of 06:55, 25 February 2011
Weeks 1-4:
We accomplished the following tasks:
- Added to the Matlab data processing algorithm to match peaks between sensor pairs. - Ordered 3 new pairs of sensors, so that each sensor within a pair does not collect data in a biased manner based on age.
Additionally, we made a game plan for the rest of the semester:
- Create new sensor array with new sensors and collect new unbiased data from the updated array.
- Email Dr. Raman about our research and a possible collaboration.
- Debug Matlab data processing algorithm.
- Ensure that Labview and Matlab data processing algorithms allows updated sensor array to reliably detect the location of the isopropyl alcohol source.
- Interface the data processing algorithm and sensor array with a robot, and develop a robot motion algorithm.
- Investigate the effects of using a shorter span of data on the accuracy of the signal processing algorithm.
Week 5:
- Created new sensor array.
- Fixed the matlab brute force algorithm
- Collected data from new sensor array, 5 trials for each distance away from the array for each side. This gave a total of 10 trials per distance, or 500 trials.
plan for this week:
- make presentation for next week (power point)
- 2 at each distance at each side
- drawing of sensor configuration
Week 6:
- Made more corrections to brute force algorithm, and processed trials from week 5. Unfortunately, the results still indicate that the sensor array detects the isopropyl alcohol source on one side of the array, no matter where the alcohol is actually located.
- Realized that the resistances that were in series with the sensors were chosen specifically for the sensors in the old array. Therefore, altered resistances in series with sensors in the circuit so that voltages produced by each sensor in a pair were consistent. I.e., sensors 1 and 2 should produce similar voltages when smelling alcohol, as should sensors 3 and 4, and 5 and 6. Used this array to collect a second batch of data (2 trials per side per distance). However, this still gave bad results, i.e., results that were similar to those from week 5's data.
- Next, we tried putting each sensor was in series with the same resistance, regardless of the disparities in voltage. We also spaced the sensors farther apart (1 inch), to improve the discrimination between sides. With this modified circuit configuration, we took 3 trials per side per distance. Processed this data, and the brute-force algorithm STILL yielded bad results. The dynamic-time-warp algorithm looks more promising, but is still pretty bad. The results of DTW suggest that sensor pair 2 is always biased towards one side. Therefore, attempted to run the DTW algorithm on only the other 2 pairs, but still working on the coding for this.
Week 7:
Week 8:
Week 9:
Week 10:
Week 11:
