Difference between revisions of "Trilateration in Robotic Sensing using Acoustic Conclusions"
From ESE497 Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 1: | Line 1: | ||
<sidebar>Trilateration_in_Robotic_Sensing_using_Acoustic_Sensors_Nav</sidebar> | <sidebar>Trilateration_in_Robotic_Sensing_using_Acoustic_Sensors_Nav</sidebar> | ||
− | ===Conclusions | + | ===Conclusions=== |
+ | Our results this semester indicate that neither quantization nor noise should cause significant error. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Future Work=== | ||
+ | Topics of Interest: | ||
+ | *How does the arrangement of anchor nodes effect the resolution map? | ||
+ | *What is the cause of bias in range estimation? | ||
+ | *How well does range estimation work on moving targets? |
Revision as of 21:56, 21 December 2010
<sidebar>Trilateration_in_Robotic_Sensing_using_Acoustic_Sensors_Nav</sidebar>
Conclusions
Our results this semester indicate that neither quantization nor noise should cause significant error.
Future Work
Topics of Interest:
- How does the arrangement of anchor nodes effect the resolution map?
- What is the cause of bias in range estimation?
- How well does range estimation work on moving targets?