Difference between revisions of "Improvement"
From ESE497 Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
As can be seen by the box at the top left of the pointed web of point, a 52.5% in resolution results from the pointing rotation. | As can be seen by the box at the top left of the pointed web of point, a 52.5% in resolution results from the pointing rotation. | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[File:Linear web.PNG| | + | [[File:pointing web.PNG|600 px|center]] |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:Linear web.PNG|600 px|center]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:11, 30 April 2010
<sidebar>Robotic Sensing: Adaptive Robotic Control for Improved Acoustic Source Localization in 2D Nav</sidebar>
We examined the extent to which pointing rotation improved source estimation. It was found that the system improvements varied depending on the particular placement of the source. Below is an example of the improvement observed when the source was outside of the physical constraints of robotic movement. Here the linear, no rotated situation was compared to that with pointing rotation. The effect of the point on the web of points and on the resolution can easily be seen.
As can be seen by the box at the top left of the pointed web of point, a 52.5% in resolution results from the pointing rotation.
