Difference between revisions of "FootFrame"

From ESE205 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 87: Line 87:
 
===Mechanical Design===
 
===Mechanical Design===
 
* The mechanical design had many challenges, one of which was securing the load sensors while not interfering with measurements. This was accomplished through the use of 3D printed sensor housings bolted to blocks that sandwiched the load sensor together and did not apply any force that could misconstrue the readings.
 
* The mechanical design had many challenges, one of which was securing the load sensors while not interfering with measurements. This was accomplished through the use of 3D printed sensor housings bolted to blocks that sandwiched the load sensor together and did not apply any force that could misconstrue the readings.
 
+
* Another concern was the accuracy of the measurements. The team was worried that the load sensors would not be very accurate. However, working in tandem with the calibration code, the team was able to test with known weights and discovered that the scale was accurate up to 0.1 pounds.
 +
* The footplates were held in place by walls bolted to the frame. This prevented a misdirection of force that would have made an inaccurate reading, but successfully held the pieces in place.
 +
* One pitfall of the footplates was the fact that they wobbled when pressure was placed near the corners. Due to the nature of the project, it would have been damaging to the wood and pieces to try and solve this problem after it was put together. However, foresight could have directed us to place the blocks at the corners, which would have prevented wobble.
 
===Data Filtering===
 
===Data Filtering===
 
+
* To prevent inevitable noise from creating inaccurate readings, a rolling average was placed into the algorithm to effectively balance out bad readings.
  
 
==Repository==
 
==Repository==

Revision as of 16:05, 1 May 2017

Overview

The goal of this project is to develop a system of sensors that can detect and read the amount of force placed on it, each sensor will have a reading for the left and right foot respectively. We plan to do this by using force sensitive resistors to take in data that is sent to arduino, this data will be used to calculate an imbalance (calculation will take place in arduino) in the forces on each sensor, and display this imbalance for the user, we will develop an algorithm as well which will display whether this imbalance is undesirable or okay. In its final state, the project will be able to find imbalances in forces from pushing with the legs when standing or squatting. Applications for FootFrame are found in weightlifting and physical therapy, among other places.

Team Members

  • Jessie Korovin
  • Adam Messer
  • Isabel Shapiro
  • Will Luer (TA)

Objectives

  • Detect the amount of force applied by feet on force sensitive resistors, up to 110 pounds per foot
  • Be able to deliver a reading of the force from each resistor into arduino, and code a program that calculates and displays the difference between the force sensitive resistors in arduino
  • Designing a foot stand that allows us to accurately and completely transmit all the force generated by feet onto the force sensitive resistors. Eight force sensors will be used to develop data (this number was chosen to support a Wheatstone bridge circuit)
  • Developing an interface to show the information collected (difference in force readings between feet in LBS)

Challenges

  • Calibrating force resistors so they do not give inaccurate readings (can sometimes differ by 10%)
  • Designing a program to deliver the reading using arduino
  • Making sure the foot stands are stable and do not break, to make sure the user remains safe
  • Making sure all the force is delivered onto the sensor
  • Filtering data to get accurate results
  • Ensuring the material that the sensor is housed in will not impact the quality of the data

Gantt Chart

Image: 1200 pixels

Budget

Total

$116.48

Objectives Revisited

Force Readings

  • Our original goal was to read up to 110 lbs per foot, but we were able to measure up to 220 lbs per foot (to give us a total of 440 lbs overall)
  • These readings were very accurate up to 0.1 lbs (tested in the lab)
  • Each set of sensors could measure force individually and additively

Arduino Programming

  • Successfully designed an algorithm that took a rolling average of the force values from each set of sensors
  • This average was used to obtain a weight difference in pounds between the two sets of sensors

User Interface

  • Used Arduino’s Serial Plotter function to show the absolute weight difference between the two sets of sensors in real time

We combined the Serial Plotter with research to accurately show when a user has an unhealthy asymmetry. As confirmed by a PhD in WashU’s medical department, 60% of total weight on one leg corresponds to an unhealthy asymmetry. We showed this on the Serial Plotter by taking 20% of the total bodyweight (which moved in real time, allowing it to account for increased force via squatting) and plotting it as a blue line on the screen. The difference in weight distribution between feet is shown as a red line on the screen. Refer to our example Serial Plot on the poster to see what it looked like in real time.

our final poster

Accurate Readings

  • The housing we designed and printed for the load sensors allowed for accurate readings
  • We surrounded the footplates with blocks of wood so they wouldn’t move while also not subtracting any force given by the user (thus providing accurate readings)
  • We used known weights to confirm that the calibration of the sensors were correct

Mechanical Design

The main ideas and their corresponding CAD diagrams are drawn out below. The overarching design is for two of the assemblies shown below to exist - one for each foot.

Image: 500pixels

(above) A top-down view of the completed assembly (picturing the foot plate over the base plate). For reasons mentioned below, a team used two rectangular pieces of wood to cover each set of load sensors, rather than circular foot plates.

Image: 500pixels

(above) An isometric view of the assembly, featuring four load sensor support blocks. The foot plate rests evenly upon each of the four load sensors. Not included in the assembly are the four walls that will be set up around the foot plate. These walls will ensure that the foot plate does not move and therefore put more pressure on one sensor than the others. The walls were not included in the above pictures for clarity's sake. The only differentiation between the CAD model and the actual design were the shape of the footplates. Due to an error from a lumber company, the team was unable to received circular footplates. Instead, two pieces of wood were cut to fit across each set of load sensors.

Image: 500pixels

(above) This view is a close up of the load sensor support block and a depiction of the load sensor itself, as well as the load sensor housing. The support block will be attached to the base plate with nails. The housing is two pieces which sandwich the load sensor together. Screws will be put through both pieces and into the support block in order to hold the load sensor in place. These housing pieces are 3D printed. They can be found on the Thingiverse online repository at a link posted below.

Challenges, Modules, and Solutions

Calibration

  • To calibrate the project's sensors, a calibration algorithm was found from the sensors' online library.
  • Using known weights, the project was able to calibrate the project to an accuracy of .1 pounds.

User Interface

  • To display information from the sensors, the project took advantage of the Arduino Serial Plot (an example is below on the poster).
  • To simplify the interface, the only information presented during the demo was the difference in weights and a constant of 20% of the user's total bodyweight.
  • This 20% constant was given by Dr. Harris of WashU's Biomedical Engineering department as a value considered unhealthy of an individual to surpass while trying to stand or squat. This means that an individual standing or squatting with more than 60% of their bodyweight on one leg or the other is at risk for injury.

Mechanical Design

  • The mechanical design had many challenges, one of which was securing the load sensors while not interfering with measurements. This was accomplished through the use of 3D printed sensor housings bolted to blocks that sandwiched the load sensor together and did not apply any force that could misconstrue the readings.
  • Another concern was the accuracy of the measurements. The team was worried that the load sensors would not be very accurate. However, working in tandem with the calibration code, the team was able to test with known weights and discovered that the scale was accurate up to 0.1 pounds.
  • The footplates were held in place by walls bolted to the frame. This prevented a misdirection of force that would have made an inaccurate reading, but successfully held the pieces in place.
  • One pitfall of the footplates was the fact that they wobbled when pressure was placed near the corners. Due to the nature of the project, it would have been damaging to the wood and pieces to try and solve this problem after it was put together. However, foresight could have directed us to place the blocks at the corners, which would have prevented wobble.

Data Filtering

  • To prevent inevitable noise from creating inaccurate readings, a rolling average was placed into the algorithm to effectively balance out bad readings.

Repository

Load Sensor CAD Files - http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2278804

Code - https://bitbucket.org/Jkorovin/footframe