Difference between revisions of "Web Application Security, Part 1"
(Moving CSRF to Web Application Security, Part 2) |
|||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
This is why you should ''filter'' strings at the input stage but not ''escape'' them until the final output stage. | This is why you should ''filter'' strings at the input stage but not ''escape'' them until the final output stage. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Denial of Service == | == Denial of Service == |
Revision as of 17:18, 8 September 2013
Application-level web security is of increasing concern among web developers. This article outlines some types of security threats to your web application and how to solve those threats.
This is Part 1 of the Web Application Security article, geared toward the material covered in Module 2. For material covered in Module 3 (MySQL), see Web Application Security, Part 2. For material covered in Module 6 (JavaScript), see Web Application Security, Part 3.
Contents
Introduction to Application-Level Web Security
Every day, computer hackers around the world penetrate web applications, often for personal profits. You may find it hard to believe, but even high-profile web sites (banks, social media, even computer security companies) are vulnerable to application-level attacks!
Not only is it embarrassing to be the programmer who wrote the vulnerable code, but it could also cost you your job. As a prudent web developer, it is imperative that you take precautionary measures to make your application difficult to penetrate. Indeed, most of the time, if your site is well-written, hackers will just move on.
Here's the golden rule: Anything in your site that accepts user input, whether via a form, an AJAX request, a file upload, or even malformed links, can be used as an attack vector. NEVER TRUST USER INPUT!!! This can be summarized in the acronym FIEO, or Filter Input, Escape Output.
FIEO in PHP
Filtering Input
"Filter Input" means that you should check that input data is of the format that you are expecting. For example, if you are expecting a number, you should cast it to a float or an int. If you are expecting a phone number, you should run it through a regular expression (you will learn regular expressions in module 4). For example:
<?php
// Cast a number to a float or an int:
$amount = (float) $_POST['amount'];
// Pass a phone number through a regular expression:
$phone = preg_match('/\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}/', $_POST['phone']) ? $_POST['phone'] : "";
?>
Escaping Output
"Escape Output" means that you need to nullify, or escape, characters that have special meaning in the markup language of interest. For example, consider the following string:
If a<b and b<c then a<c.
Since a less-than sign means the start of a tag in HTML, and b is a valid tag name, the above string will not render as you might expect in HTML. Therefore, we need to escape our less-than signs by using HTML entities:
If a<b and b<c then a<c.
The "<" is an HTML entity that will render as a less-than sign. (For more information on HTML entities, read this article on the WebPlatform wiki.)
PHP provides a function that, given a string, will convert special characters to their HTML entity equivalents.
<?php
$str = "If a<b and b<c then a<c.";
// Convert special characters to HTML entities before outputting:
echo htmlentities($str);
?>
Note: htmlentities escapes a string for use in HTML, but it does not escape a string for use in other markup languages. You need to use different methods when escaping strings for other languages.
Why Not to Escape Input
Filtering your input is important, as shown above. However, it is bad practice to escape your input. For example, don't do this:
<?php
$message = htmlentites($_POST['amount']); // bad practice
// then store $message in a database, etc.
?>
The reason this is bad practice is that it permanently ties that string to its final output format. For example, what if some time down the road you want to support display of that message in a PDF? You'd need to go back and remove all the HTML entities again.
This is why you should filter strings at the input stage but not escape them until the final output stage.
Denial of Service
Denial of Service (DoS) is probably the most widely used attack vector to date, and the one employed by hacktivist groups like Anonymous. The concept is simple: flood a target server with more requests than it can possibly handle, resulting in server downtime.
A Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack is a special kind of Denial of Service attack that involves multiple, unrelated machines sending requests to the server simultaneously. DDoS attacks are more powerful than "un-distributed" DoS attacks because there are dozens, hundreds, even thousands of machines, all with different IP addresses, all requesting data from your server at the same time; in DoS attacks, there is only one computer doing the attacking. Hacking groups are known to have millions of machines around the world ready to perform a DDoS attack on command. It's a very interesting topic to Google about, but beware that you might spend several hours reading web sites if you start!
There are two flavors that a DoS attack can take:
- Bandwidth-based: Saturate the connectivity link.
- Packet-based: Saturate the processing capability of the equipment.
Mitigating DoS Attacks
Unlike the other types of attacks we've discussed (or will soon be discussing), DoS attacks cannot usually be prevented by good coding practices. Here are some tips that should help:
- Always keep the most up-to-date software on your server and firmware on your router (if applicable).
- If you represent a firm with a lot of resources, anycast may be an option. Rather than having your site hosted in just one server, the load of your site will be shared between many different servers. Anycast systems are expensive, but they help fend off non-hardcore DoS attacks.
- You can set up a constellation of reverse proxy nodes. You might also benefit from using a web server like Nginx instead of Apache. For more information on constellation reverse proxy nodes, see: http://blog.unixy.net/2010/08/the-penultimate-guide-to-stopping-a-ddos-attack-a-new-approach/
- Limit things like file upload size and CGI scripts. These are known to be easy targets for DoS attacks.
In short, DoS attacks are not pretty, and there's not any sure-fire way to prevent them. Just do your best and hope that you don't get attacked by DoS.
Real-Life Examples
Format String Injection
If you like using functions like printf and sprintf, you may find yourself writing
printf( "%s", htmlentities($_GET['username']) ); // good example
It is tempting to reduce this to
printf( htmlentities($_GET['username']) ); // BAD example
Although the second implementation will work for most usernames, it is not correct! You are essentially making the client-provided username the format string for printf. If the username contains any percentage sign (%), it will be interpreted as the start of a parameter in the format string, causing your script to return errors. Worse yet, it is known that certain combinations of format parameters will actually reveal system information in the error log.
Solution
The solution is simple: never put dynamic input as the format string. It should always be static, either hard-coded or from a stable source like a YAML file. User-supplied input should always be fed into the string as arguments to sprintf and printf.
If you are outputting only one little string like in the example above, it suffices to use a PHP function like print or echo:
print htmlentities($_GET['username']); // good example
echo htmlentities($_GET['username']); // good example
Packet Sniffing
HTTP Packet Sniffing is a fundamental web attack that has been known for a long time, but it was never widely exploited. Essentially, the attacker can listen on his current WiFi connection for packets going in and out, then either act as a "man in the middle" to either perpetuate a Content Spoofing attack or just hijack the victim's session. (This is when user agent testing would prove helpful.) The Firesheep plugin for Firefox makes it easy to perform Packet Sniffing attacks yourself: just go to Starbuck's, open up Firesheep, and you can hijack anyone's session who is on the same public WiFi. Scary.
Solution
The best and easiest way to prevent packet sniffing is to secure your site with an SSL certificate (https). This will cause each request to perform handshakes, preventing Man-in-the-Middle attacks. Unfortunately, SSL certificates are not free; you can expect to pay around $100 per year for a small web site. Because of the handshakes, they also consume slightly more resources. However, if your site controls sensitive data from users (e.g. credit card information), an SSL certificate is a must.
Real-Life Examples
Any web site that does not use the HTTPS protocol is vulnerable to packet sniffing attacks. After the release of applications like Faceniff and Firesheep, high-profile sites have switched to using the HTTPS protocol by default:
Server Configurations
Sometimes hackers attempt to penetrate your application from the server side rather than the application side. Server-side security is beyond the realm of this course, but here are some things you should keep in mind.
- Use a highly secure root password, and it should be one that you don't use anywhere else. Seriously.
- Use a firewall system to block unnecessary ports from public access. SSH and Web Server should really be the only ports you need. You should keep the web serve on port 80, but you have the option of moving SSH to a port other than 22 to make it slightly more secure.